Friday, January 21, 2011

The Primer: Language Lessons or, How to Talk Like an Asshole



First lesson in ultra-"progressive" blogland - watch what you say and how you say it, buster!   And if they change the terms on you midstream, you'd better step lively and change along with them.   Because we aren't individuals, we're assorted groups, and each of those groups identify themselves and you'd better identify them the way they tell you to.  Because, bigot!   If you belong to more than one group, jackpot!  They call that "intersection" and if you have intersecting oppressions, everyone else had better sit down, shut up, and listen.   That includes people who may belong to that same group if they happen to step outside the progressive point of view - for example, Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas and Condi Rice are self-loathing sellouts to their respective sex/race/oppressed status.   They need to shut up and listen too, because they aren't real people.

Ok so terms.  Sometimes "black" is acceptable but sometimes you have to say "African-American".  You'll have to figure out when and how to use each.   Actually, SHUT UP.  If you're white, you don't know anything about it anyway.

"Gay" is usually OK but most of the time you have to use the new alphabet soup.   It has changed, you know.  First it was "gay" or "homosexual".   Then it was gay/lesbian.  Then it was GLB (Gay, Lesbian, Bi).   Then it became LGBT - Lesbian (women first because girl power!), Gay, Bi, Trans.   Now it is LGBTQI - Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans, Queer, Intersex.

In order not to be labeled "heteronormative" you must now use the term "cis-gendered" or "cis" for short, meaning that you are not transsexual.   Transsexual itself has become very complicated for us cis-folk, too, because it is no longer a requirement that someone undergo hormone treatments or have any surgery to change their sex.  You can physically be a man with a beard and a functional penis/testicles who takes no hormones and doesn't have breast implants and dresses in men's clothes but if you say you're a woman, then you're a woman and everyone better refer to you as such or else.   You can be a physical woman with breasts and periods who wears makeup and dresses but if you say you're a man, you're a man and you'd better be referred to as such or else.   Heaven help the establishment that tries to make you use the gender-specific bathroom that you seem to belong to because the only thing that matters is what you have decided you are.   The discriminatory practices such as not letting you change your sex identity on your driver's license because you haven't physically changed your sex in any way are just examples of bigotry, heteronormatism, and the oppressive patriarchy.

If you are a male you are probably a rapist.   Rape is defined as whatever a woman says it is.  Women NEVER lie.

In the case of writing/referring to people, you must use gender-neutral terms.   He/she has now been replaced by "zie" and his/her has been replaced with "hir".   Careful; it's very easy to slip back into he, his, she, hers.   If you slip you might be a patriarchal oppressor.

The intersection of dominating structures of oppression (patriarchy, racism, ableism, looksism) is now referred to as the "kyriarchy".  And brother, once you start hearing these oppression stories, you'll realize what a wonderland of kyriarchy we really live in.  You might not even know you're being oppressed this very minute!  But you probably are.   So listen carefully.

Avoid any language which might imply that someone is crazy or mentally ill - you say "neuro-atypical" now.

Avoid any language that smacks of ableism (oppression of those who are mentally or physically "disabled"; itself a derogatory term), patriarchicalism, racism, looksism (whether you say someone is beautiful or ugly; both are equally oppressive) or any other ism you might be able to think of.   We'll come across more as we go.   For example the period after the election known as the "lame-duck" session?  Derogatory disablism plus waterfowl.   Must find new term.

If you think I'm making any of this up, more power to you.   I wish to hell I was.   Can you imagine living in such a world?   It must be the most depressing fucking place you could imagine, right?  Where everyone and everything is just that bad, and every word anyone speaks is out to get you?   Where writing a blog for assorted misfits is your actual livelihood, that which you depend on for your daily bread?   And because you do it, you think you are providing the most valuable service imaginable?   To be honest it looks more to me like *exploiting* those people by depending on their donations from their own poverty-stricken pockets, but what do I know?  I'm just a taxpayer so I'm the enemy.

4 comments:

  1. OJ-

    "Black" rolls off the tongue (one syllable) and paints the mental picture of what I'm trying to convey. Sorry all you political correct-o's who are really rascist f&%ks, but you can have African-Americans who are white because there are Caucasians living in Africa!

    Remember when "gay" meant happy and light-hearted. Well it still means that, but limp-wristed as well. Seriously, "LGBTQI?" Is it a lifestyle choice or the periodic name of a new element?

    Plus I just don't get the whole transgender thing and how that works in the equation. If you were a man and now you're a woman and you're with a man...are you still gay?

    Can we just can the political correctness and call them "homos" like Archie Bunker used to?

    -Archie Bunker's Illegitimate Stepson

    ReplyDelete
  2. DISCDUDE ~
    >> . . . If you were a man and now you're a woman and you're with a man...are you still gay?

    Actually, you were NEVER "gay".
    You were a "fag". And, yes, you're still a "fag".

    But that might just be my politically incorrect alter-ego speaking. And if so, please don't say anything negative about him (or her) because you would then be acting in a very oppressive manner which, of course, is very mean-spirited and "conservative", and just not in line with our new "inclusive" or "multicultural" society.

    So, just watch how you respond to me, buddy, or I'll report you to the ACLU, or (even worse for you) to "The Shredder".

    Me, she, myself, and I, know my rights, and we expect to be treated with the respect I'm due!

    ~ D-FensDogg
    'Loyal American Underground'

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Can we just can the political correctness and call them "homos" like Archie Bunker used to?"

    "“I never said a guy who wears glasses is a queer. A guy who wears glasses is a four-eyes; a guy who's a fag is a queer.” - Archibald Bunker

    "Kids are rotten Edith! When they found out my name was Archibald they took me to the Bronx and left me there!" - A. Bunker

    Oooooh, he threatened to report you to...ME. You don't want THAT now, do you?

    ReplyDelete
  4. "If you were a man and now you're a woman and you're with a man...are you still gay?"

    Depends...are you still fully physically a man, no hormones or surgery and nothing whatever to indicate you might be female but STILL insist you be called one? Then you might be a patriarchal oppressor. In denial at that.

    Yeah I remember when gay meant happy. We had a friend who's nickname was "Gay" and no one thought a thing about it. I had actual gay teachers and no one thought much about that either (they were kind, good teachers and they didn't shove things down people's throats.) There are still homosexuals who live by the gay, lighthearted and happy way of doing things; they are the people I like. A little lisp doesn't cross my eyes anyway. Heck, I grew up with Paul Lynde and Charles Nelson Reilly...they didn't HIDE anything but it just wasn't a big deal because they didn't force it on us either. They were funny as hell, too and I can overlook anything if you make me laugh. Plus they were just so damn likeable. The thing to remember is that these people were NOT "in the closet" - they weren't keeping secrets; they just weren't obnoxious activists making endless demands.

    I know people say we must be misremembering the good old days...but I don't think so. I think I remember perfectly well. Happy carefree people can still be referred to as gay; screw what the world thinks about it. Just don't call them any alphabet soup names (they don't like it any more than we do) and give 'em a tad of respect and friendliness, and let the good times roll :)

    ReplyDelete